For easier analysis, let’s drag all of our files back onto our personal laptop using FileZilla. (If you want you can try to read the Gaussian .log
file in the terminal, but you’ll soon see why that’s not going to scale well.)
We won’t use the fort.7
file and eqMeCyhex_oe
has a total size of 0 bytes (i.e., there’s nothing written in it) so for the sake of cleanliness we can delete those. First, let’s look at our optimized structure to make sure the final geometry makes chemical sense. Open eqMeCyhex.log
in GaussView (download it from the code repo if you’re not following along).
GaussView shows us a perfectly normal equatorial methylcyclohexane.
You should always check your structures to make sure they are generally expected since not all mathematical solutions are physical ones. Sometimes our jobs will give us chemically nonsensical solutions simply because the algorithm found a particular energy well that it couldn’t get out of.
The computers are here to do your math, not your thinking.
Fantastic, let’s grab some numbers. One of the first things we noticed is that eqMeCyhex.log
is just a really long text file that GaussView5 is able to generate a picture from. So, open eqMeCyhex.log
in a text editor (or follow along in another window using the link above) and we search the output for energies and vibrational/thermochemical data.
First we’ll want to check for imaginary (negative) vibrational frequencies which indicate saddle point structures. Search eqMeCyhex.log
for Harmonic frequencies
:
...
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
1 2 3
A A A
Frequencies -- 159.1459 229.6806 248.3997
Red. masses -- 2.2917 1.2669 1.3457
Frc consts -- 0.0342 0.0394 0.0489
IR Inten -- 0.0025 0.0069 0.0006
...
Gaussian prints all vibrational frequencies in the output in ascending order so we only need to check the first entry to ensure that all our vibrational frequencies are real.
Next, we’ll calculate the energy for our optimized structure. At this point, I highly recommend that you read this technical document from Dr. Joseph Ochterski about thermochemistry in Gaussian.1 It describes how Gaussian calculates various thermochemical values and their proper usage in computing ΔGrxn. Searching eqMeCyhex.log
for correction
produces:
...
Zero-point correction= 0.198783 (Hartree/Particle)
Thermal correction to Energy= 0.204789
Thermal correction to Enthalpy= 0.205654
Thermal correction to Gibbs Free Energy= 0.171472
Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies= -274.642438
Sum of electronic and thermal Energies= -274.636431
Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies= -274.635566
Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies= -274.669748
...
With most ab initio methods absolute energies of molecular systems are calculated relative to free electrons and nuclei which is why they are large and negative.
By default, Gaussian reports energies in Hartree atomic units ($E_h$ or A.U.):
The values we’re interested in are:
Thermal correction to Gibbs Free Energy= 0.171472
Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies= -274.669748
The Thermal correction to Gibbs Free Energy
is calculated by:
The Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies
is the sum of the above Thermal correction
and the electronic energy
(also known as the single point energy
since its the energy at a single point on the potential energy surface).2 This thermally-corrected single point energy
is the value that should be used to calculate free energies of reaction ($\Delta G_{rxn}$).
Gaussian calculates the single point energy
of each intermediate geometry it generates during optimization as well as at the start of a vibrational frequency analysis. We can exploit this fact to save us from having to set up another calculation. To find the single point energy
search eqMeCyhex.log
for the last occurrence of SCF Done
:
SCF Done: E(RM062X) = -274.841184603 A.U. after 9 cycles
With this value the relationship between these three quantities becomes clear.
SCF energy: E(RM062X) = -274.841184
Thermal correction to Gibbs Free Energy = 0.171472
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
E(RM062X) + Thermal correction = -274.669748
Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies = -274.669748
🎉🎉 That's all folks!!! 🍾🍾
You know everything you need to run your own Gaussian jobs!
You know everything you need to run your own Gaussian jobs!
In our final lesson we’ll see how we can use Gaussian to calculate relative conformational energies.
A note on split basis calculations
It is common in large systems to use a smaller set of basis functions to find the optimized geometry (this is part of the Long Course) and then use a larger basis set to recalculate the single point energy. In this case the calculated Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies
and the thermally-corrected single point energy
derived from the larger basis set will not be the same.
You must manually correct single point energies when running split-basis calculations.
My First Gaussian Job |
Calculating A-values |
References
(1) Thermochemistry in Gaussian
(2) Potential energy surface